BLB Solicitors - The Leading Chronic Pain & CRPS Solicitors
BLB Solicitors - The Leading Chronic Pain & CRPS Solicitors
  • Home
  • Chronic Pain Claims
    • CRPS Compensation
    • Fibromyalgia Compensation
    • Myofascial Pain Syndrome Compensation
    • Somatic Symptom Disorder Compensation
    • Neuropathic Pain Compensation
    • Functional Neurological Disorder Compensation
    • Chronic Pain Syndrome Compensation
  • Case Studies
  • Chronic Pain Blog
  • Testimonials
  • Contact Us

Home » Recording personal injury medical examinations: will it soon become compulsory?

BLB Chronic Pain News Oct 18th, 2019
Recording sound

Recording personal injury medical examinations: will it soon become compulsory?

We have written previously on the plethora of issues arising from both the covert and open recording of medical examinations. The most common situations where recording takes place are during examinations in the context of personal injury claims and at ATOS assessments.

In the context of a personal injury claim, if the Claimant has covertly recorded an examination by an expert instructed by the Defendant, the Defendant will inevitably object to the Claimant being allowed to rely upon the recording as evidence in their claim. Whether something can be relied upon in evidence is referred to by lawyers as the ‘admissibility of evidence’. Where the parties cannot agree on whether something is admissible, a judge will have to decide.

Mustard – v- Flower

This week, a procedural judge (called a ‘Master’) in the High Court has ruled on the admissibility in evidence of recordings of three medical examinations in one personal injury claim. The judge also took the opportunity to make more general observations and recommendations on this increasingly topical and often controversial issue.

In the case in question, Mustard – v- Flower, on the advice of her solicitor the Claimant had recorded her examinations with all three of the experts instructed by the Defendant. Two of those recordings were made covertly and, while the first part of the third examination was recorded openly, the next part was not. The Claimant did not record the examinations with the experts instructed by her own solicitors.

Reprehensible

While describing the covertly obtained recordings as “reprehensible”, the judge, Master Davison, nevertheless ruled that they were admissible. Commenting more generally, the Master went on to say that:

“It is [in] the interests of all sides that examinations are recorded because from time to time significant disputes arise as to what occurred. In that situation, it is important to have a complete and objective record of the examination, which is subject to appropriate safeguards and limitations on its use. It is desirable that the parameters of such recording should be on an “industry-wide” agreed model which caters for the many issues capable of arising and, I might add, which pays careful attention to the containment of the costs that might potentially be generated.”

With that in mind, he suggested that claimant and defendant lawyers, represented respectively by the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers [APIL] and Forum of Insurance Lawyers [FOIL], work together on developing a protocol to govern the recording of examinations. Ultimately, this may well lead to the recording of medical examinations in personal injury claims becoming routine or even compulsory.

You may also be interested in the following articles:

Can I record my PIP assessment?

Are patients entitled to record and publish a medical consultation?

They’re watching me: CRPS, Chronic Pain and Surveillance

Dealing with surveillance evidence

What is ‘fundamental dishonesty’ and how can it affect a personal injury claim?

Richard Lowes
Make an Enquiry

Contact Us

Contact Form

Left Column

Right Column

Centre

 
Sending

Recent Articles

  • The law on accessible toilets
  • Taking medication abroad
  • CRPS and excessive sweating
  • The importance of medical records in your CRPS compensation claim
  • CRPS and sleep

Share this Article

Newsletter Sign-up

* indicates required

Legal Glossary

Find Out More

You may also like...

  • Oct 8th, 2019
    Spinal cord stimulation: research reveals spinal chemical changes
    Read Article
  • Oct 21st, 2019
    Antibiotics to treat chronic pain: finally debunked?
    Read Article
View All Related Articles

Get in Touch Today

Contact Form

Left Column

Right Column

Centre

 
Sending

1 Edgar Buildings,
George Street,
Bath, BA1 2DU

01225 462871 01225 445060
Authorised & Regulated by Solicitors Regulation Authority (No. 636644).
©2025 BLB Solicitors  |  Privacy & Terms