BLB Solicitors - The Leading Chronic Pain & CRPS Solicitors
BLB Solicitors - The Leading Chronic Pain & CRPS Solicitors
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Andrew Atkinson
    • Bruce Dyer
    • Clare Lowes
    • David Gazzard
    • Mark Tawn
    • Richard Lowes
  • Pain Conditions
    • CRPS Solicitors
    • Fibromyalgia Solictors
    • Myofascial Pain Syndrome Compensation Claim
    • Somatic Symptom Disorder Compensation Claim
    • Neuropathic Pain Compensation Claim
    • Functional Neurological Disorder Compensation
    • Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME) Compensation Claim
    • Chronic Pain Syndrome Compensation Claim
  • Unhappy With Your Solicitor?
  • Case Studies
    • Testimonials
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
General News Mar 1st, 2008

Compensation and long-term care for serious injury

In a landmark court judgment, the Court of Appeal has ensured that seriously injured people relying on compensation payments for their long term care no longer face critical funding shortfalls when paying for care staff.

The current system of calculating compensation had left many people who had been catastrophically injured, through no fault of their own, unable to meet the steep rises in the cost of hiring carers, support workers and personal assistants.

Compensation for future care needs is either awarded as a lump sum or in annual periodical payments. The Government, when setting up the periodical payments legislation, decided that they would usually be linked to the retail price index (RPI).

Many Claimant Solicitors have long argued that indexing these payments to RPI (which is designed to measure the cost of living) would mean that claimants would lose out as historically the RPI has been much lower than the annual rise in earnings in the care sector. Therefore the increases in periodical payments would fall behind the increasing cost of their care.

As a consequence they are not able to afford to maintain their essential care arrangements leading either to the risk that they will be forced to cut their care or seek to maintain it with the prospect of running out of money later in life.

Claimant Solicitors proposed that compensation payments be calculated against the Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings (ASHE) instead, which offers a far more accurate guide of the cost of care. The defendants had argued that the court did not have the power to use any alternative index, other than RPI.

On the basis of this decision it will be possible for claimants needing future care to opt for periodic payments and for the court to link those payments to an index relevant to the cost of care.

Richard Lowes
Make an Enquiry

Contact Us

Contact Form

Left Column

Right Column

Centre

 
Sending

Recent Articles

  • Fibromyalgia Pain Points
  • Hydroxychloroquine treatment for CRPS
  • Chronic pain may increase the risk of heart attack and stroke
  • How to cope with lockdown when you have chronic pain
  • Can I claim PIP for Fibromyalgia?

Share this Article

Newsletter Sign-up

* indicates required

You may also like...

  • Feb 1st, 2008
    Solicitor condemns practice of third party capture
    Read Article
  • Jul 1st, 2008
    What is a Scaphoid Fracture
    Read Article
View All Related Articles

Get in Touch Today

Contact Form

Left Column

Right Column

Centre

 
Sending

1 Edgar Buildings,
George Street,
Bath, BA1 2DU

01225 462871 01225 445060
Authorised & Regulated by Solicitors Regulation Authority (No. 636644).
©2021 BLB Solicitors  |  Privacy & Terms